The
Cabinet of Dr Caligari.
Fig
1. Caligari Poster
The
Cabinet of Dr Caligari is an
interesting movie to say the least. It is black and white and silent
but despite all that it is filled with plot twists, murder, love,
deceit and drama, everything a modern classic would have. Of course
it won't be everyone's cup of tea but it really is a movie
masterpiece if you take a moment to appreciate it and realise a story
this complex was captured on film and created into a movie in
1919/1920.
Speaking
of story this movie has a difficult one to follow. This can be
attributed to the fact that the movie is silent and so there is very
little that can give exposition to us but also because the movie is
rather cleverly made. It is one of those movies that can change your
perspective every time you watch it if a person points out even the
littlest detail that you may not have seen before. My synopses of the
movie at the moment is that the lead character Mr. Francis who seems
like a rather troubled man is telling his story to a stranger (who in
my mind is possibly a shrink, having seen the movie beginning to end)
and he recounts a fantastical tale of an insane doctor, Dr. Caligari,
who has schemes to murder people using a somnambulist called Cesare.
A somnambulist is a person who is trapped in a death-like sleep
however they can be awakened and ordered to fulfil tasks without
question, like a sleeper agent. As Mr. Francis recounts his tale
events transpire and Mr. Francis' best friend Mr. Alan is murdered by
Cesare and then Cesare attempts to murder the woman Mr. Francis
loves, Jane Olsen, but fails as he finds her beautiful so instead
resorts to kidnapping her. The kidnapping fails as Cesare runs out of
strength and so he places her on the ground and flees into the night.
While this is happening Mr. Francis who has started to become
paranoid is watching Dr. Caligari and what he believes is Cesare
sleep throughout the night. This rules out the fact that Caligari and
Cesare are involved in the murders in his mind, however he still has
his suspicions and so the next night he returns to Caligari's house
with the police and they search Cesare's Box (Cesare sleeps in a
box). They discover that the 'Cesare' in the box is actually a doll
and Dr. Caligari runs from the police, however he is chased by Mr.
Francis. Now this is where the movie gets confusing. Caligari is
chased to an asylum and disappears inside. Mr. Francis follows him
and asks the people who work there if Dr. Caligari was a patient
there. They reply to him that there is no Dr. Caligari in the asylum
to their knowledge however the Director had just arrived and he (Mr.
Francis) could ask him. Mr. Francis goes to the Director's office and
who is sitting behind the desk? None other than Dr. Caligari! Francis
quickly leaves the room and tells one of the workers that the
Director is Dr. Caligari. See? I told you it gets confusing. A bit
more confusion to go though. That evening Francis returns to the
asylum with the police and they look through the Director's research
notes and discover that Caligari was infact an 11th
century mystic who would wander from town to town with his
somnambulist and murder townsfolk. We the audience experience some
flashbacks and discover that is what the Director was trying to
replicate, or was it? See this is where I believe everyone has their
own thoughts on what happened and these are mine. You see during one
of these 'flashbacks' we see the Director get admitted to his own
asylum and then they finish. The next shot we see is subtly different
and I will explain why in a moment but in it we see Francis walk out
of the asylum and into the courtyard with the stranger from the
beginning. They walk past Cesare, who if he did murder those people
should be in prison should he not? Also Cesare is awake and holding
flowers which is also strange but pieces of the puzzle start to come
together in your head. We also see Francis walk up to Jane who is
sitting in the courtyard and asks her to marry him. She doesn't even
look at him and says no because she is the queen and cannot marry
outside royal blood. We are told throughout the film that she is in
love with Francis so this is also very strange. Then comes the most
significant part of the scene. The Director walks out of the asylum
and down into the courtyard. Didn't we just see him get put into the
institute?! As he walks into the courtyard he is attacked by Mr.
Francis who is subdued and taken into the asylum. We finish with the
Director saying “At last I recognise his mania, he believes me to
be the mythical Caligari. Astonishing! But I think I know how to cure
him now.” I believe that Francis lost his friend Mr. Alan and it
sent him mad, he was admitted to the asylum and he blamed the death
on a story character, Dr. Caligari, making various people in the
institute into characters from the novel, imagining it all. This can
most prominently be seen in the movie sets and backdrops, remember
how I mentioned there was a subtle difference earlier? This is in the
courtyard back drop. Everything in this backdrop is very square and
shaped smoothly and evenly whereas before all the back drops were
twisted and sinister with clawing shadows and huge contrast between
light and dark.
“The
exaggerated, largely cold and sinister look of all subjects and
objects is the first hint that we just might be inside someone’s
nightmare.”
(Kaufman)
Fig
2. Courtyard Fig 3. Town Square
Fig.
4 Cesare
“Robert
Wiene's silent classic has always been considered a keystone of the
horror genre.”
(Parkinson). It is easy to see why people would consider this film to
be the forefather of modern motion pictures especially impressionist
films and horror films. In so many films made since this one you can
see reoccurring themes, scenes and styles. When I watched I was
reminded instantly of 3 movies, The
Imaginarium of Dr Parnassus,
Bram
Stokers Dracula
and Edward
Scissorhands,
all for different reasons. The
Imaginarium of Dr Parnassus takes
on a similar idea that there is this surreal, story telling world
however as the movies draw to a close we discover there is a darker
reason for the world existing, in Caligari
it
is because it is imaginary, in a mental patient's head and in
Parnassus
it
is because there is an on going fight with the Devil. I was reminded
of Dracula
plainly
and simply through the scene where Cesare breaks into Jane's room, it
reminded me of how the supposedly evil, monstrous character can find
something beautiful still and I think the exaggerated shadows also
reminded me of Dracula when he is in his castle and of course the
fact that Cesare sleeps in a coffin shaped box is very vampiric.
Lastly I was reminded of Edward
Scissorhands because
of the establishing shot which showed the sprawling town of
Hostenwall rising into the sky on the side of a hill. The spindly
sharp style of the town reminded me of the house at the top of the
hill in Edward
Scissorhands and
as the film progressed it was easy to see where Tim Burton got his
style and inspiration from, it is particularly obvious in his
animations like Nightmare
Before Christmas and
The
Corpse Bride.
Another theme that Burton and of course many other directors have
taken from this film is the gothic idea behind it, pale faces and
dark clothes, contrasting to give a haunting appearance. No one can
deny it is possibly the most influential pieces of cinema ever
created. “Undoubtedly
one of the most exciting and inspired horror movies ever made.”
(DP)
In
conclusion I believe that The
Cabinet of Dr. Caligari
may be one of the greatest movies ever created, certainly not in my
top 5 favourite but I appreciate that without this film so many other
films I have come to know and love over the years wouldn't exist. It
was in its time a visionary masterpiece which would have made
audiences feel intrigued and uncomfortable at the same time by
utilizing the very impressionist style backgrounds which gave the
gothic horror and even more nightmarish feel. Also I think that some
of the shots and ideas where amazingly done considering that the film
was made in 1920 and I do believe it is a work of genius for its
time.
Bibliography
Kaufman,
S, (2014), Little
White Lies,
http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/theatrical-reviews/the-cabinet-of-dr-caligari-27635
Parkinson,
D (Unknown), Empire
Online,
http://www.empireonline.com/reviews/reviewcomplete.asp?DVDID=6268
DP,
(Unknown), Timeout,
http://www.timeout.com/london/film/the-cabinet-of-dr-caligari
Pictures
Wiene,
R. Fig
1. Caligari Poster (1920) -
http://cdn8.openculture.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Cabinet-Of-Dr.-Caligari-.jpg
(accessed on 23/09/14)
Wiene,
R. Fig
2. Courtyard Still (1920) -
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh6ENHUTl05-epWfn2J5RhVVLQUor9JwI1Ixt3cPm5ZxeKm3ORo6HPkl5bSIakzNwW50ZZyEMYVLcOQK9_9HOj4Q8I4JMpg4Z0k2wWDF5t2_dFM8nNd1P-NtKWGPvQ3CVELDSgIRQOti_o/s1600/catphoto.jpg
(accessed on 23/09/14)
Wiene,
R. Fig
3. Town Square Still (1920) -
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/fd/CABINET_DES_DR_CALIGARI_01.jpg
(accessed on 23/09/14)
Wiene,
R.
Fig 4. Cesare Still - (1920)
http://www.cultureshockmiami.com/sites/default/files/styles/305x225/public/images/2013_cabinetofdrcaligari_tw.jpg
(accessed on 23/09/14)
Hi Brem!
ReplyDeletePhew! No wonder it took you 2 hours! :)
Your review is certainly very thorough, and has raised some very interesting points of discussion, namely the use of set to depict the varying states of mind, and the influence this film has had on more contemporary productions.
So, I have a couple of pointers for you when you write your next review. Firstly, you do not need to give a complete synopsis of the film :) You should focus on the reasons you are watching the film - in this case, the set, the lighting etc - and discuss those in detail, but only give a broad overview of the story itself. This review came in at just short of 1500 words - that is almost a whole essay... you are not expected to write a whole essay a week :)
My second point concerns the use of the 1st person. This is a tricky style issue that takes some getting used to, but it is what makes your writing sound academic rather than chatty. So for example, instead of 'The spindly sharp style of the town reminded me of the house at the top of the hill' you could say, 'The spindly sharp style of the town is reminiscent of the house at the top of the hill'. I think Phil has posted the guide on how to write in the 3rd person, on the group blog, and I put the link up yesterday, so have a look at that before the next review.
Just a couple of little points about your referencing - make sure that you have the date as well as the surname, after the quote, and if you do not know the date, you put s.d... so for example (Parkinson, s.d.) Make sure that the quotes are properly embedded in the text - by that I mean, introduce and then unpick them, rather than just dropping them in. For example, you can say something like, 'As Parkinson notes in his review...' and then follow it up with something like, 'From this it could be said that...'
Looking forward to reading the next (slightly pared-down) review :)